| "Honor thy father and thy mother." We the People... ON PARENTAL RIGHTS The Solution: The Parental Rights Amendment "Through activist courts and the threat of ratifying the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), big government intrudes on families more and more. Already, the liberty of parents to direct the upbringing of their children has greatly eroded in federal courts and in such settings as public schools, local libraries, and your doctor’s office." -- Michael Farris, president, ParentalRights.org
The only solution to the attack on the child-parent relationship is the Parental Rights Amendment -- securing the rights of parents to raise their children. Only a constitutional amendment will ensure that the courts of our nation protect the fundamental right of parents to raise their children. And only a constitutional amendment will override international law that seeks to undermine the parental role. As the only complete solution to the danger confronting the child-parent relationship, the Parental Rights Amendment will place current Supreme Court doctrine protecting parental rights into the explicit text of the Constitution. Only the Parental Rights Amendment completely eliminates all threats to the child-parent relationship. It is the only comprehensive response to the attack on parental rights across our nation. Below is the draft text for the Parental Rights Amendment. View the annotated version here.
DRAFT PARENTAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION SECTION 1 The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right. SECTION 2 Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served. This article shall not be construed to protect actions or decisions to end the life of any child, born or unborn. SECTION 3 No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article.
QUICK FACTS ON AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION - Only a constitutional amendment will ensure that parental rights will be honored in the United States, and protected from the threat of international law.
- Only 33 amendments have ever been passed by Congress, and of these, only 27 have been ratified by the states.
- Passing an amendment takes supporters at every level of government – in Congress, in committees, and in the states. Every American can play a vital role in this process by signing the petition and involving others in this campaign.
|
A constitutional amendment will ensure that judges who are currently denying parental rights will be obligated to recognize them. It will ensure that judges who are presently refusing to recognize parental rights because of their lack of explicit protection within the Constitution will instead safeguard parental rights. The founders of this country created a nation ruled by laws, not men. Placing parental rights into the text of the Constitution ensures that law will defend the American family. A constitutional amendment will shield the child-parent relationship from government intrusion, regardless of who sits on the Supreme Court. Not only does an amendment adequately address the threat posed by judges who refuse to recognize parental rights, but it also meets head-on the threat against the child-parent relationship posed by international law. HOW AN AMENDMENT PROTECTS THE FAMILY FROM INTERNATIONAL LAWAs a legally binding international treaty, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is capable of permanently altering the role of the parent within the American family. If ratified, the UNCRC becomes the law of the land, unable to be held in check by state or national legislation. The only way to protect the rights of parents from the destructive policies contained in the UNCRC is through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Presently, except in cases where a parent has been proven to be "unfit," American law presumes that the parent is acting in the best interests of the child, and defers to that parent's decision. The UNCRC, in contrast, supplants this traditional presumption in favor of parents with a new presumption in favor of the state. The Senators who originally opposed the ratification of the UNCRC when it was originally signed by President Clinton in 1995 believed that the Convention marked a significant departure from the American concept of the relationship between state and child, and was incompatible with the right of parents to raise their children. The only way to protect the vital role of parents from this cataclysmic shift is through amending the U.S. Constitution to reflect current Supreme Court doctrine which preserves the right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children. That's why the Parental Rights Amendment is so important. If passed, the Parental Rights Amendment will protect and preserve the vital child-parent relationship for generations to come. WHY NOW?The judges on the Supreme Court will change over time, but the law will not. If the U.S. Constitution is amended to secure parental rights, the vital child-parent relationship will be effectively shielded from intrusion by the government. Amending the constitution is an enormous task—requiring time, resources, vision, dedication, and hardworking people who will make it happen. But it is not impossible. Timing is everything. Parental rights are in an uncertain state within the federal courts, and danger is on the way. In only a matter of time, international law could erase the rights that most American parents take for granted. That’s why time is of the essence. We can’t afford to wait until parental rights are gone before seeking to defend them—now is the time to take action. You can play a vital role in the process of amending the Constitution by joining with ParentalRights.org in the fight to protect children and parents. If you believe that the vital role of parents in the lives of their children should be protected and preserved, then we need your participation in the campaign to pass the Parental Rights Amendment! Rebekah Pizana | National Coalition Director | ParentalRights.org | 540.645.9475 (c)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
| Target Date Set for CRC Ratification Proponents of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) have set a target date by which they would like to see it ratified in the United States: November 20,2012. That date is the anniversary of its adoption by the UN General Assembly back in 1989.
Last month the Child Rights Campaign began pushing online petitions calling on the President to move for CRC ratification. Tuesday, Time ran an online opinion piece by Lawrence Cohen and Anthony Debenedet calling for the United States to ratify by November 20. In the piece, they name our organization and then provide some misinformation to convince readers we are wrong.
Clearly, our opponents have no intention of letting up. They are pressing to make ratification happen before Obama – and their best opportunity – are gone.
That is why we must continue to stand against them. And we need your help.
The CRC purports to protect children, but would replace fit parents with government bureaucrats and judges as the first line of defense for our kids. In addition, it would take family law authority away from our states and make it an international treaty obligation at the federal level.
This is because under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, any ratified treaty becomes the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state are bound by it, regardless of conflicts with federal law or state laws or constitutions.
Cohen and Debenedet cite Reid v. Covert to contend that our concern is false because “no international treaty has the power to override the U.S. Constitution.” But this ignores the fact that parental rights do not appear in the Constitution; they are implied rights found in the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court in Reid v. Covert addressed rights not expressly in the Constitution, such as parental rights, thus: “To the extent that the United States can validly make treaties, the people and the States have delegated their authority to the National Government, and the Tenth Amendment is no barrier” 354 U.S. 1 (1957).
Sadly, the CRC is supported by international organizations with billions of dollars in assets (and with access to outlets like Time magazine), while we must depend entirely on the support of individual donors – people just like you who understand the dangers of letting the government decide whether fit parents are making the best decisions for their children.
We must continue to fight for free families and free U.S. courts, no matter how deep the pockets of those who oppose us. As they are turning up the heat, we need your help to meet strength with strength.
First, please make as generous a donation as you can right now. We must make certain this treaty is not passed. To give, simply visit parentalrights.org/donate or call us at 540-751-1200 (8:30 - 5:00 EST).
Then, pass this on to everyone you know. The freedom of parents to raise children according to their own convictions, and the authority of U.S. states to pass family law without dictates from the federal government or an overseas committee, hang in the balance. Preserve America’s future by supporting the Parental Rights Amendment today.
Sincerely,
 Michael Farris President
|
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .jpg)
| January 10, 2012 Getting Busy in State Legislatures In the last few weeks state legislatures across the country have convened and taken up lots of activity involving parental rights. So although many of you did not receive any email from us last week, we actually sent out several – to a few particular states. What’s more, we expect this kind of localized activity to continue, so please be on the alert for action emails to come your way as thinks get moving in your state.
Though the Amendment’s introduction in the national Congress is still delayed, there are so many ways to stay involved in the parental rights movement. Consider last week: - In Washington state supporters communicated opposition to HR 2193, a third party visitation bill that would allow a judge to overrule the decision of fit parents as to who can visit with their child. (Though the bill passed the committee, it did so with amendments. Watch for an update soon.)
- In New Hampshire we encouraged supporters to speak in favor of HB 1382, a bill that will improve respect for parental rights by allowing parents to approve alternative learning plans for their students ages 16-17, and by requiring a truant officer to get a warrant or parental consent before taking custody of an allegedly truant child. A hearing for the measure was originally scheduled for last Friday, before being moved to February 2.
- In Georgia we urged support for HR 738, a resolution calling on Congress to propose to the States for ratification the Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. A hearing on this resolution in the House Children and Youth Committee is scheduled for Today at 2:00 p.m.
- In Missouri and Illinois we alerted readers to an opportunity to hear from ParentalRights.org Vice President and Constitutional Law professor William Wagner at an upcoming conference in St. Louis.
Resolutions have already been introduced (some carried over from 2011) in Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Minnesota (as well as Georgia, mentioned above), with others being prepared for introduction in other states as well. If you live in a state that takes up a resolution this year, expect to hear from us at key moments to call and support the measure in a House committee, a Senate committee, or even in a floor vote. Often the difference between adopting a resolution and seeing it fail is in the willingness of supporters in the state to take a moment and call or email a handful of committee members at a pivotal moment. [Note: You can keep track of all of the action at parentalrights.org/resolution.] Action Item So please be ready to act when called upon, and until then, please help grow our list of supporters in order to multiply our voices at the appropriate time. To do so, simply ask your friends to sign up at parentalrights.org/petition, or invite them to visit OverruledMovie.com. If you are able, would you also please give to support these efforts at parentalrights.org/donate?
Thank you for standing with us to preserve parental rights in the federal Constitution, in the national Congress, and even in your particular state!
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey Director of Communications & Research |
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
Share This Online > | Find Us On Facebook |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.jpg)
January 10, 2012 |
 Now take just 7 minutes to share OverruledMovie.com. Everyone in America needs to see this eye-opening film! (Select "7-min Trailer" at the bottom of the page.) |
 Oppose HB2193 in Wash. State
If you live in the state of Washington and missed our January 5 alert, please read it here and call to oppose adoption of this bill that would harm parental rights in your state! |
Share This Online |

|
| Federal Parental Rights Issues Arise As legislative sessions get started across the country, we have become aware of a number of issues to watch, including three significant issues at the national level.
First, ParentalRights.org is joining with several other parent-friendly organizations and leaders to support HR 2769, Rep. Ron Paul’s “Parental Consent Act.” This bill would prevent federal funds from going to any organization “to establish or implement any universal or mandatory mental health, psychiatric, or socioemotional screening program.” It goes on to define such programs to include “any student mental health screening program that allows mental health screening of individuals under 18 years of age without the express, written, voluntary, informed consent of the parent or legal guardian of the individual involved.” (emphasis added)
We do not often take a stand on any legislation beyond the Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But we fully support the requirement of informed parental consent for any program intrusive to the privacy of children; therefore, we support this bill in the U.S. Congress.
Two other concerns that have also caught our attention at the national level require more study before we can take an informed and definitive stand. We are investigating these new regulations and are not yet declaring a position. These include:
New Department of Labor regulations that appear to impact the right of parents to determine whether their teenage children manage certain kinds of equipment or work with certain animals on family farms.
New Department of Education guidelines for interpreting and applying privacy policies under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (known as FERPA). These policies may impact the right and ability of parents to protect the privacy of their children who attend public schools.
Those of you concerned with these policy changes may rest assured we are looking into them and considering the appropriate position and action to take. Action Item We are not requesting any immediate action on these issues at this time. But please be prepared in the weeks ahead, as we may call upon you to contact Congress regarding one or more of these matters. Of course we will keep you posted on the Parental Rights Amendment as well.
In the meantime, why not share Overruled again by linking to OverruledMovie.com from your blog, Facebook page, Twitter feed, or other network? Or you could send an email to your friends pointing them to OverruledMovie.com. Let them know it doesn't have to take a lot of time - there is now a 7-minute version available (8 min. with credits) to inform them about the threats to parental rights.
Thank you for your continued support for parental rights and the Parental Rights Amendment!
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey Director of Communications & Research |
|
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .jpg)
January 3, 2012 |
 Now take just 7 minutes to share OverruledMovie.com. Everyone in America needs to see this eye-opening film! (Select "7-min Trailer" at the bottom of the page.) |
Farris' Parental Rights Case In case you missed the Dec. 22 update, the case against Ken and Erin Stieler was dismissed. Their right to make medical decisions for their son was preserved! |
Share This Online |

|
| Mysterious Christmas Bump Invites Imitation After enjoying some time off with my family last week, I returned to the office Monday intent on catching up and moving ahead – and I discovered a mystery. I call it the “Christmas bump.”
In tracking our web visits over the last month, I noticed a significant up-tick in traffic to ParentalRightsUS.org for December 25 and 26. We haven’t used that website much lately, but for that 2-day period it enjoyed a revival as nearly 200 visitors stopped by – an increase of 2500% over the daily average!
The visitors almost all came from Facebook and went to our Palmdale page. Someone obviously posted a link to that page on December 25 and did a wonderful job of pushing it to their friends. Over the next 2 days, 170 different people visited that page and stayed (on average) long enough to read it. What’s more, at least 12 of those visitors signed the petition to support the Parental Rights Amendment.
That’s a small percentage of 170, but it’s 12 more people than would have signed if someone hadn’t posted the link to Facebook that produced our “Christmas bump.” Action Item In light of this mysterious success (by whom, I do not know), consider what you can do to generate a “bump” of your own. Perhaps you can also post a link on your Facebook account. Perhaps you can post a link or an article on your blog. Everything we publish is free for you to grab and use, as long as you use it in its entirety (or duly credited) and for its intended purpose - to promote the Parental Rights Amendment.
Some of our most popular items for posting (or re-posting) include the Palmdale page mentioned above and the new 7-minute version of Overruled: Government Invasion of Your Parental Rights.
There are other big news items coming your way starting by the end of this week. But until then, why not take a quick moment and create a "traffic bump” of your own? One person (I assume) generated nearly 200 visits last week. How big a bump could we all create if we work together today?
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey Director of Communications & Research |
|
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
| Update: Stieler Case Dismissed! On Thursday, December 15, Michael Farris* and the Michigan legal team presented a petition to dismiss the case against Ken and Erin Stieler. You will recall that young Jacob Stieler’s parents had opted not to subject him to further chemotherapy once multiple PET scans showed that his cancer was gone, but the state Health & Human Services department filed charges of medical neglect against those loving parents.
The judge took the petition under advisement for the weekend and has just reported his decision to dismiss the case. This is a tremendous victory for the Stielers and for families around the country, as it affirms once again the fundamental right of fit parents to make medical decisions for their children.
The Supreme Court in 1979 voiced the presumption “that natural bonds of affection lead parents to act in the best interests of their children” (Parham v. J.R.). The dismissal of this case reaffirms that presumption in American law.
Thank you for standing with us to protect children by empowering parents, as Mr. Farris works to empower Ken and Erin Stieler of Michigan, and thank you for continuing to support the Parental Rights Amendment! *ParentalRights.org is not a legal organization, does not have lawyers on staff, and is not in a position to take up parental rights cases. Mr. Farris has taken this case through his role as chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), a prominent national legal organization. ParentalRights.org is a lobbying organization whose mission is the adoption of the Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. |
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.jpg)
| A December Greeting from Michael Farris As 2011 winds down and we look back on the last 12 months, I want to extend my heartfelt thanks for your generous support of our efforts and for your confidence in the mission of ParentalRights.org.
I’m grateful that when it comes to protecting families, you know the difference between talk and action – and you are taking action.
Your support, whether financial or otherwise, has helped us make needed headway in our battle for parents’ rights. You’ve helped us make this a national issue, and you’ve put us in a good position for engaging Congress with the Amendment in 2012.
You and I know that America is at a critical juncture for parental rights. Right now, the legal right of fit parents to raise their kids is foggy at best. With no clear constitutional standard for parents’ rights, the courts are confused. And that leaves families at the mercy of a judge’s whim.
But you stand with us against the trend that says “a government bureaucrat or a foreign committee decides what’s best for your child.” Like me, you believe that you the parents, not bureaucrats, should have the biggest role in your child’s life.
So you have fueled our successes. Thanks to you, in the last year we: - released a gripping new docudrama and grassroots tool revealing the erosion of parental rights – Overruled: Government Invasion of Your Parental Rights;
- blocked passage of the U.N.’s Convention on the Rights of the Child in the U.S. Senate for the current Congress by securing 37 cosponsors on SR99;
- mobilized volunteers to build our largest grassroots army ever;
- successfully passed resolutions calling for the Amendment in three more states – Montana, Idaho, and Florida; and
- successfully blocked attempts by anti-parent organizations to pass pro-CRC resolutions in Rhode Island and Illinois.
I am especially excited about the opportunities our new movie Overruled opens up to advance parental rights.
You see, our biggest challenge is reaching people with our message. While we already know (thanks to a 2010 Zogby poll) that an astounding 93% of Americans agree with the historic definition of parental rights, most of them don’t realize their rights are in serious danger.
Overruled is an excellent tool to help us – and supporters like you – overcome this publicity challenge. In just the first couple of weeks the film had over 82,300 views online and much positive feedback. With you we are hard at work to spread the film to as many people as possible.
With your help, ParentalRights.org is leading the movement to preserve parents’ rights in the text of the Constitution. That’s why your continued support is so essential to our mission.
As my staff and I look ahead to 2012, we have to calculate how much funding is available for each of our crucial programs. A special one-time gift* would help finance the objectives we’ve set in place to pass the Amendment.
Please take a minute to send a generous year-end donation to ParentalRights.org today.
Your gift will help us achieve our goals for the new year as we work toward passage of the Parental Rights Amendment in Congress. I’m confident that with your help we will succeed.
With my warmest regards for a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays,
Michael Farris President *Because ParentalRights.org is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization, contributions made cannot be counted as charitable donations for federal tax purposes. |
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Please Take 12 Minutes... A brief 7-minute professionally-produced video has just come available that talks about a matter that is very important to me. I have watched it and taken action, and now I am asking you to do the same. This is truly a critical issue affecting all of us. Won’t you join me in being part of the solution?
Please take just 12 minutes right now to learn about the precarious state of parental rights in America today, and to pass it on. Here is what I’m asking you to do, minute-by-minute:
1. (1 min.) Read this email and get started. 4. (1.5 min.) If you are able, visit ParentalRights.org/donate and contribute to sustain this vital cause.
5. (1 min.) Copy the contents of this email into a new email, replace my signature with yours, and send it to 5 of your friends you believe will take action when they see the film. Be sure the subject line of your new email is the same: “Open When You Have 12 Minutes.”
Thank you for taking just 12 minutes to learn about this vital topic. I believe it will prove important to you, as well. All of America needs to know about this threat to our families, and we must all take action!
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey Director of Communications & Research |
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page last updated 01/26/12 |